HomeMy WebLinkAboutRe: Petition Signatures - Review
Mike Plane
From:Shayne Nope
Sent:Monday, April 17, 2023 18:42
To:arnel culum
Subject:Re: Petition Signatures - Review
I have two valid signatures. Once the city clerk receives 18 more I will immediately begin the review.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 17, 2023, at 6:30 PM, arnel culum <arnelculum@gmail.com> wrote:
\[EXTERNAL SENDER\]
that is your opinion ??
You can proceed how ever you want, I’m doing what I believe to be the correct thing to do.
Like I said you will need to make a decision if you want to issue a title and description.
And fix up any issues with the petition.
Once that is done ?? then this will be a conversation with the county elections on what they will accept.
They might say yes we will accept
Docusign Or they might say no ?????????????????????? I will see
your job again is to make a decision if you want to issue a title, description and fix up the petition
it’s not to have a debate with me about the law lol ??????? I’m not a lawyer
What blows my mind is you can’t determine if those people are handicapped, who knows ?????????????????????? maybe
they can’t write ?????? for what ever reason, do you know if they are using a computer to help them fill it a
form ??????????????????????
This is why county elections decides if these are valid, they have methods to verify if residents of twin
fall’s want this to proceed.
The initial signatures do not count towards the total, it is only used to gauge if there is an interest in the
issue , example would be let’s say in my initial portion I had something crazy like each resident will also
get life time supply of Mountain Dew ?????????????????????? those signatures would not count.
I believe I have provided what you need, more signatures will be dropped off by Lijah ??
I believe she had 6 people stop by and sign the petition in her store
1
We need to have a title and description and the the petition fixed by the city lawyer (you :) so the real
work can start.
I believe you are required to your job because it appear that more the 20 individuals living in twin falls
have indicated they want this.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 17, 2023, at 5:29 PM, Shayne Nope <snope@tfid.org> wrote:
Mr. Culum,
Your assumption is wrong.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 17, 2023, at 5:22 PM, arnel culum <arnelculum@gmail.com>
wrote:
\[EXTERNAL SENDER\]
Mr. Nope . I am assuming that you are potentially participating in
disqualifying citizens of Twin Falls.
By potentially not providing county elections all of the notarized
documents.
please stick to your job and provide the information to the county
elections office,that I have Provided to the city, ??
If you feel that you are not required to issue a title and description that
is your call.
???????
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 17, 2023, at 5:08 PM, Shayne Nope
<snope@tfid.org> wrote:
Mr. Culum,
You misread my email and jumped to conclusions. I’m
still not certain why you choose to do that but I can’t
change how you react. Your entire packets were
2
submitted to the county and two of the three physical
signatures were verified.
Best,
SN
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 17, 2023, at 4:50 PM, arnel
culum <arnelculum@gmail.com> wrote:
\[EXTERNAL SENDER\]
You are required to submit what I have
provided to the city to the county
electricians
Please note I will be pulling a public
request with the county, to make sure
you are providing all information the
county ??????? they will determine if the
information I have provided is valid.
If you are providing a partial notarized
document to the county electrician that
might be illegal.
Please note that I am providing all of
the forms that people have submitted
even if they appear to be disqualified.
This is because of transparency
who would disqualify submissions
would be the county not you ?????????????
I’m not sure why you think you have
anything to do regarding validation,
that is the county job not your ??
Sent from my iPhone
3
On Apr 17, 2023, at
4:32 PM, Shayne Nope
<snope@tfid.org>
wrote:
Mr. Culum,
Attached is a copy of
the review by the
county. As I mentioned
before, electronic
signatures (the google
forms) are void and
could not be counted
toward the 20 required.
A copy of the petitions
and signature sheets
will be kept as a public
record (IC 34-
1801B(10)) Further, I
would just point out a
couple of things that
are glaring.
1. At least one of
the people who
filled out a
google form is
from Buhl and
your affidavit
says that you
“believe…that
each signer is a
qualified
elector of the
city of Twin
Falls. In this
case, that
person’s google
form is void, so
there is no
issue.
2. You still have
two issues on
the petition. As
outlined in IC
34-1801A(1)
you need to
select “one (1)
subject and
matters
properly
4
connected with
it.”
Best,
<image005.png>
<image002.png> Shayne T. Nope
City Attorney
<image003.png>
City of Twin Falls
<image006.png>
208.280.8041
<image008.png>
208.735.7374
<image010.png>
snope@tfid.org
<image012.png>
www.tfid.org
203 Main Avenue East
Twin Falls, Idaho 83301
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This
e-mail contains confidential
information that is protected by
the attorney-client and/or work
product privilege. It is intended
only for the use of the
individual(s) named as
recipients. If you are not the
intended recipient of this e-mail,
please notify the sender, and
please do not deliver, distribute
or copy this e-mail, or disclose its
contents or take any action in
reliance on the information it
contains.
<Signatrue Page 4-
17b.pdf>
<Signatrue Page 4-
17a.pdf>
5