HomeMy WebLinkAboutFW%3A Accessibility in Twin Fa (1)
Mike Plane
From:Travis Rothweiler
Sent:Wednesday, August 23, 2023 15:59
To:CM-Council
Cc:Josh Baird
Subject:FW: Accessibility in Twin Falls - Letter to Council
Council,
FYI – Please see the message below. I will send these to Mr. Root later today.
Travis Rothweiler, ICMA- CM
City Manager
City of Twin Falls, Idaho
From: Josh Baird <JBaird@tfid.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2023 3:17 PM
To: Travis Rothweiler <trothweiler@tfid.org>; Ruth Pierce <rpierce@tfid.org>
Cc: Mitch Humble <Mhumble@tfid.org>; Troy Vitek <tvitek@tfid.org>; Jonathan Spendlove <JSpendlove@tfid.org>
Subject: RE: Accessibility in Twin Falls - Letter to Council
All,
Mr. Root refers to PROWAG as becoming official next month – as far as I can tell, it was just published on August 8,
2023. I was unaware it was moving from draft form to final form and am thankful for him informing us of that change. I
am familiar with both the draft version of PROWAG and the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines
(ADAAG). There has often been a disconnect between these two separate yet interrelated guidelines, in part, because
PROWAG had not been finalized. From a previous ADA course I attended, I remember learning jurisdictions have the
option to adopt one or the other as our standard if we so chose. I don’t believe we ever adopted one or the other. With
PROWAG becoming finalized, perhaps that changes. It would be good to review the final version and become familiar
with it and decide if we wanted to adopt a standard.
The City completed an ADA Transition Plan in 2014. We should consider updating that plan in the future, especially
since it has been nearly a decade since its inception. This could potentially be added to next year’s budget process.
Mr. Root referred to generalized issues and provided several pictures. I would need clarification from him to understand
what he is trying to convey, especially since I believe we have made significant strides and progress in recent
years. Later he reminds us that we have a high number of facilities within the City that are not compliant with the 1991
rules. Again, I agree we have many locations where we are not compliant, but we have been diligently working to
improve the City with new ADA ramps and large lengths of sidewalk. City Council has allocated sidewalk specific funds
over the last several years to ensure we are trying to advance accessibility.
Later, Mr. Root outlined a concern with Noreen Jansen being frustrated with the City’s unwillingness to provide
accessible routes in her neighborhood and lacking transit options. I have not been informed about this concern until I
read this letter. We can surely reach out to her and discuss any needs she may have and how we can work to provide
her what she needs. Jon Caton did something similar several years ago with a citizen who requested to have a specific
ADA compliant route. I believe the Street Department has a dedicated special request line item for this type of work.
1
I am unfamiliar with the SS4A grant Mr. Root refers to. We can look into it and determine if it is something we should
pursue.
I believe City Code 8-2-12 puts the responsibility of sidewalk improvements on the adjacent property
owner. Considering the responsibility rests with property owners, City Council has approved a recurring budget for the
sidewalk grant program to assist with that cost. The program has been reasonably successful in assisting property
owners for several years. If City Council desires to take responsibility for sidewalks, that would be fine. However, we
may need additional funding to shoulder that responsibility that has heretofore been borne by property owners.
I have no issues updating the references of “handicapped” with more conforming language. I was unaware we had such
references.
In short, I feel Mr. Root brings up several good points and opportunities. Whether the amount of money we allocate is
appropriate toward sidewalks and accessibility is subjective. I believe, however, if we have a good ADA Transition Plan
that outlines our intent to remedy the known issues, it goes a long way to mitigating risk. While I believe we still have
much work to do, I believe we have made great progress over the last several years.
Joshua R. Baird
public works director | city of twin falls
phone: (208) 736-2274
jbaird@tfid.org
From: Travis Rothweiler <trothweiler@tfid.org>
Sent: Monday, August 21, 2023 8:09 AM
To: Ruth Pierce <rpierce@tfid.org>
Cc: Mitch Humble <Mhumble@tfid.org>; Troy Vitek <tvitek@tfid.org>; Jonathan Spendlove <JSpendlove@tfid.org>; Josh
Baird <JBaird@tfid.org>
Subject: RE: Accessibility in Twin Falls - Letter to Council
Mayor,
Good morning and thank you for sending this to us. Josh Baird is on the state board that works on Idaho Standards for
Public Works Construction. He can add more to this conversation. I have included Jonathan and Troy as well.
Josh, Jonathan and Troy,
FYI. Please see the attached letter. Let me know your thoughts. Thanks!
Travis Rothweiler, ICMA- CM
City Manager
City of Twin Falls, Idaho
From: Ruth Pierce <rpierce@tfid.org>
Sent: Monday, August 21, 2023 7:20 AM
To: Travis Rothweiler <trothweiler@tfid.org>
Cc: Mitch Humble <Mhumble@tfid.org>
Subject: Fw: Accessibility in Twin Falls - Letter to Council
We all received this last night. I let him know I forwarded to City staff for their input.
2
Interesting letter....
Ruth Pierce
Mayor
City of Twin Falls
The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location.
From: Trevor <trevorroot@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2023 9:43 PM
To: Ruth Pierce; Chris Reid; Nikki Boyd; Craig Hawkins; Jason Brown; Spencer Cutler; Alexandra Caval
Cc: Steven.Kiggins@magicvalley.com; info@acluidaho.org; England, Christine (USAID)
Subject: Accessibility in Twin Falls - Letter to Council
\[EXTERNAL SENDER\]
Dear City Council,
Please find attached a letter to the Council regarding accessibility
in the City of Twin Falls and the newly finalized PROWAG rule, set to
be effective Sept 7th.
The attached letter includes requests to:
- Incorporate PROWAG rules in all City documents (codes, standards,
checklists, drawings)
- Revise the Budget for Accessibility Planning and Construction
- Revise City Code and the Budget regarding the Sidewalk Match Program
- Revise City Code to use appropriate terminology
- Ensure City infrastructure meets current ADA and MUTCD rules where
"altered" after 1991
- Proactively bring any pre-1991 infrastructure into compliance with
ADA, MUTCD, and PROWAG
- Ensure traffic infrastructure and signal phasing supports
pedestrian safety (FHWA, AASHTO)
It is very possible that some of these comments should be addressed to
ITD for the highways within the City, if ITD manages the traffic
3
infrastructure. Even if so, I would hope that City staff has the
ability to cooperate with ITD for safety and accessibility upgrades,
as well as encourage them to refresh the crosswalk striping on 2nd
Avenues.
I happen to be licensed as a Civil Engineer in Idaho, but I do not
intend to provide engineering work within Twin Falls. All statements
are made in my personal (non-engineer) capacity and should be
validated by the City's Engineer before relying on their accuracy.
Feel free to email me with any questions that I can help with in a
non-technical role, or if I can help point the council to ways that
other cities are addressing accessibility.
Thank you,
Trevor Root
trevorroot@gmail.com
4