HomeMy WebLinkAboutPZ18-0099 PZSRP CITY OF
'j`WIN F•" CITY OF TWIN FALLS
Community Development Department
203 Main Avenue East Phone: 208-735-7267
°F P.O. Box 1907 Fax: 208-736-2641
Twin Falls, ID 83303-1907 www.tfid.org
SFR V ING
Dear Applicant:
RE: Zoning Request
Enclosed is the copy of the staff report, narrative, and site/area maps that will be
presented to the Twin Falls City Planning & Zoning Commission for consideration of your request
that will be heard at the public meeting on Tuesday,January 29, 2019 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council
Chambers located at 203 Main Avenue East, Twin Falls, Idaho. Your item has been scheduled as
listed on this agenda. No new information or changes to this application or proposal shall be
accepted after publication of the notice of public hearing. If new information is submitted
after the publication of the notice of public hearing and it is determined the new information is
pertinent and necessary this request will be rescheduled at the applicant's expense.
The applicant is responsible for making a presentation to the Planning & Zoning
Commission at the public hearing. Staff will provide overhead copies of the area map, the site
plan and any other pertinent information. The applicant may use these documents during
his/her presentation. Idaho Law states any document or exhibit introduced by any person(s)
during the public hearing shall be retained by City Staff and made a part of the record.
Please review the enclosed information. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to
contact our office at 208-735-7267.
Sincerely;
-X'itcc/�%rig (4XiJmllotw
Jonathan Spendlove
Planning&Zoning Director
CITYF Twin Falls Planning &Zoning Commission
Agenda
IV I Tuesday,January 29, 2019, 6:00 PM
'Q�oQv 203 Main Avenue East
SFRv�N�
Twin Falls, ID 83301
Members -
City Limits: Danielle Titus, Vice-Chair; Craig Hawkins; Gerardo "Tato" Munoz, Chairman; Ed Musser; Carolyn
Bolton; Curtis Hansen; Craig Kelley
Area of Impact: Ryan Higley; David Detweiler
1) Confirmation of Quorum/Call Meeting to Order
2) Consent Calendar
a) ACTION ITEM: Approval of Minutes from the following meeting:January 8, 2019
b) ACTION ITEM: Approval of Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law:
• Core Cycle
• Subaru
3) Public Hearings
a) ACTION ITEM: Request to amend PUD#264 to allow"Hotel" as a permitted use and increase maximum
building height to sixty feet(60')for property located at 2151 Fillmore Street c/o EHM Engineers on behalf of
Geronimo, LLC. (PZ18-0099)
By: Steve O'Connor, City Planner
b) ACTION ITEM: Request for a Special Use Permit for the purpose of operating an Automobile Sales and Repair
or Service Facilities on property located at 154 Washington Street on behalf of Jose Angulo. (app. PZ18-0100)
By: Brock Cherry, City Planner
c) ACTION ITEM: Request for a Special Use Permit for the purpose of operating an Automobile Sales and Repair
of Service Facilities on property located at 1534 Blue Lakes Boulevard North c/o Errin Bliss on behalf of Goode
Motors. (PZ18-0108)
By: Brock Cherry, City Planner
4) Upcoming Meeting(s)
a) INFORMATIONAL: Worksession: Wednesday, February 6, 2019
b) INFORMATIONAL: Tuesday, February 12, 2019
5) Adjournment
Any person(s) needing special accommodations to participate in the above-noticed meeting could contact Lisa A.Strickland (208)735-7267 at
least two working days before the meeting. Si desea esta informacion en espanol, Ilame Leila Sanchez(208)735-7287.
CITY OF TWIN FALLS
PLANNING&ZONING COMMISSION
Public Hearing Procedures for Zoning Requests
1. Prior to opening the public meeting,the Chairman shall review the public hearing procedures, confirm a quorum is present and introduce
staff present.
2. Individuals wishing to testify or speak before the Commission shall wait to be recognized by the Chairman,approach the
microphone/podium,state their name,then commence with their comments. Following their statements,they shall write their name on
the Sign-In record sheet(s) located on a separate table near the entrance of the chambers. The administrative assistant shall make an
audio recording of each public meeting.
3. The Applicant,or the spokesperson for the Applicant,shall make a presentation on the application/request. No changes to the request
may be made by the applicant after the publication of the Notice of Public Hearing—WHICH IS A MINIMUM OF 15 DAYS PRIOR TO
PUBLIC HEARING. The applicant's presentation should include the following:
• A complete explanation and description of the request.
• Why the request is being made.
• Location of the Property.
• Impacts on the surrounding properties and efforts to mitigate those impacts.
The Applicant is limited to 15 minutes, unless a written request for additional time is received and granted by the Chairman prior to
commencement of the public meeting.
4. Upon completion of the applicant's presentation City Staff will present a staff report which shall summarize the application/request,
history of the property, if any,staff analysis of the request and any recommendations.
• The Commission may ask questions of staff or the applicant pertaining to the request at this time.
S. The public will then be given the opportunity to provide public testimony/input/comments regarding the request.
• The Chairman may limit public testimony to no more than two(2) minutes per person.
• Five(5)or more individuals, having received personal public notice of the application under consideration,may select a
spokesperson by written petition. The spokesperson shall be limited to 15 minutes.
• No written comments,including e-mail,received after 12:00 o'clock noon on the date of the hearing will be accepted for
consideration by the hearing body. Written comments,including e-mail,received by 12:00 o'clock noon or before the date of
the hearing shall be either read into the record or displayed on the overhead projector either during or upon the completion
of public comment.
• Following the Public Testimony,the applicant is permitted a maximum five(5)minutes rebuttal to respond to Public
Testimony.
6. Following the Public Testimony and Applicant's response,the Public Input portion of the public hearing shall be closed-No further public
testimony is permitted. Commission Members,as recognized by the Chairman,shall be allowed to request clarification of any public
testimony received of the Applicant,Staff or any person who has testified. The Chairman may again establish time limits.
7. The Chairman shall then close the Public Hearing. The Commission shall deliberate on the request. Deliberations and decisions shall be
based upon the information and testimony provided during the Public Hearing. Once the Public Hearing is closed,additional testimony
from the staff,applicant or public is not allowed. Legal or procedural questions may be directed to the City Attorney.
** Any person not conforming to the above rules may be prohibited from speaking. Persons refusing to comply with such prohibitions
may be asked to leave the hearing and thereafter removed from the room by order of the Chairman.
ciTv of Date: Tuesday, January 29 2019
'j'WIN FALLS Date: Y
To: Planning and Zoning Commission
From: Planning &Zoning Department
P St-Nv�Nn P
ACTION ITEM
Request:
Request to amend PUD #264 to allow "Hotel" as a permitted use and increase maximum building height
to sixty feet (60') for property located at 2151 Fillmore Street c/o EHM Engineers on behalf of Geronimo,
LLC. (PZ18-0099)
Time Estimate:
25 minutes between staff and the applicant.
Background:
See analysis.
Approval Process:
Per Twin Falls City Code 10-6-1.4(E) Approval of a ZDA Sub-District requires a preliminary presentation to the
Planning and Zoning Commission for a review of the proposed changes. A public hearing shall then be held before
the Commission for a recommendation to the Council to amend the PUD, amend with recommendations or deny
the request.
Budget Impact:
N/A
Regulatory Impact:
Approval of the 1st Amendment of PUD#264, will outright permit "Hotels" as a land use on the specified
property, and allow for additional height up to sixty feet, an additional thirty-five feet (35') at the fifty
foot Canyon Rim Setback.
History:
The history on this property and request is a bit lengthy and convoluted. There have been multiple PUD's approved in this
area dating back over two decades,and multiple amendments to those PUD's.
To complicate matters, a Citizen's Design Review Committee was created to consider a 10 story hotel with a convention
center in this area. The committee approved the request in January 2007. However, staff has no record of a development
agreement being approved by City Council to develop the property in that manner.
Since the committee's approval in 2007, Canyon Park West PUD#264 has been approved and recorded with no mention of a
high rise hotel. It is staff's determination that the current iteration of the governing PUD supersedes that prior committee's
approval.
Analysis:
This request is to amend the Canyon Park West PUD #264 to add "Hotel" as a permitted use specifically on the
property identified as the "Hotel Property" within the PUD amendment. The amendment also requests to
increase the maximum height to sixty feet (60'), and remove the requirement for a design review committee per
the CRO development standards.
The original Canyon Park West PUD#219, approved in 2000, required an SUP for a hotel.
Canyon Park North #1 PUD #222, also approved in the year 2000, would have required an SUP for any hotel on
properties within its boundaries. However, PUD #222 is no longer in effect as Canyon Park West PUD #264
encompasses and supersedes all of PUD#222.
Canyon Park West PUD #264, approved in 2012, includes all of PUD#222 and most of PUD#219, a few properties
were excluded (such as Zions Bank and Golden Corral). The requested amendment is specific to PUD #264 which
must follow both the C-1 and CRO use regulations and development standards as listed in City Code. If the
proposed amendment is approved, it would outright permit a hotel on the property identified as the "Hotel
Property" and allow for a maximum building height sixty feet (60'), as measured from the top of the existing
retaining wall (see attachment#5), without a design review committee recommendation.
As a point of clarification this request does not forego the requirement to meet the design standards for
construction as set forth in PUD #264 (see attachment #6). The renderings provided by the applicant have colors
and materials depicted. However, those items are not part of the application, and are not being requested for
change. The renderings are conceptual, and have not been reviewed for compliance with the applicable design
standards. Compliance with colors and materials are reviewed during Building Permit submittals.
Conclusion:
The Commission is tasked with making a recommendation to the City Council. The Commission may do
one of the following:
• Recommend approval as presented
• Recommend approval with conditions
• Recommend denial
• Table the request to a future date in order to gather additional information
Attachments:
1. PUD Amendment Staff Report PZ18-0099
2. 1 -Vicinity
3. 2 - Narrative
4. 3 - Draft PUD Amendment
5. 4 - Site Plan
6. 5 - Building Renderings
7. 6 - Building Height Exhibit
8. 7 - Buliding Design Guidelines
9. 8 - Photos
10. 9 - Citizen Emails
CITY OF
TMN FALLS
Comprehensive 4*1
Staff Report
<F Q�
75 BLUE SeRV1NC�
LAKES BL v
To: Planning &Zoning Commission
Presenter: Steve O'Connor, City Planner
1 Request: To Amend PUD #264 to allow
"Hotel" as a permitted use and to increase
maximum building height to sixty feet (60') for
IV
`SRe T property located at 2151 Fillmore Street.
Application: PZ18-0099
Applicant:
i
O 9BLi1 Geronimo, LLC
KESBL Y
O •• c/o EHM Engineers
208.734.4888
AERIAL PHOTOAPRIL 2016 dthibault@ehminc.com
REFERENCE ONLY
19 5 BLUE
Public • 2019
Analysis would outright permit a hotel on the to consider a 10 story hotel with a
This request is to amend the Canyon property identified as the "Hotel convention center in this area. The
Park West PUD #264 to add "Hotel" as Property" and allow for a maximum committee approved the request in
a permitted use specifically on the building height sixty feet (60'), as January 2007. However, staff has no
property identified as the "Hotel measured from the top of the existing record of a development agreement
Property" within the PUD amendment. retaining wall (see attachment #5), being approved by City Council to
The amendment also requests to without a design review committee develop the property in that manner.
increase the maximum height to sixty recommendation.
feet (60'), and remove the requirement Since the committee's approval in
for a design review committee per the As a point of clarification this request 2007, Canyon Park West PUD#264 has
does not forego the requirement to been approved a recorded with no
CRO development standards.
meet the design standards for mention of a high rise hotel. It is staff's
The original Canyon Park West PUD construction as set forth in PUD #264 determination that the current iteration
#219, approved in 2000, required an (see attachment #6). The renderings of the governing PUD supersedes that
SUP for a hotel. provided by the applicant have colors committee's approval.
and materials depicted. However,those
Canyon Park North #1 PUD #222, also items are not part of the application, Comprehensive Plan Compliance
approved in the year 2000, would have and are not being requested for This area is designated as Mixed Use on
required an SUP for any hotel on change.The renderings are conceptual, the Future Land Use map for the 2016
properties within its boundaries. and have not been reviewed for Comprehensive Plan "Grow With Us."
However, PUD #222 is no longer in compliance with the applicable design Mixed Use is a broad use category
effect as Canyon Park West PUD #264 standards. Compliance with colors and ranging from Multi-Family complexes to
encompasses and supersedes all of materials are reviewed during Building Light Commercial all within the same
PUD #222. Permit submittals. development or even the same
building. A hotel meets these criteria as
Canyon Park West PUD#264,approved History it would add another service to a range
in 2012, includes all of PUD #222 and The history on this property and request of services found along a corridor which
most of PUD #219, a few properties is a bit lengthy and convoluted. There supports Civic, Commercial,
were excluded (such as Zions Bank and have been multiple PUD's approved in Recreational and Residential uses.
Golden Corral). The requested this area dating back over two decades,
amendment is specific to PUD #264 and multiple amendments to those The Comprehensive Plan also contains
which must follow both the C-1 and PUD's. a vision and goals with the intent to
CRO use regulations and development protect the canyon rim. "Development
standards as listed in City Code. If the To complicate matters, a Citizen's near the Canyon Rim should be
proposed amendment is approved, it Design Review Committee was created carefully considered. Retail
development along the Canyon Rim Approval Process Conclusion
threatens the appeal and natural quality Per Twin Falls City Code 10-6-1.4(E) The commission is tasked with making a
of the rim. The Canyon Rim is an Approval of a ZDA Sub-District requires recommendation to City Council. The
important feature and viewpoint, a a preliminary presentation to the Commission may do one of the
striking visual landscape, and a coveted Planning and Zoning Commission for a following:
recreational site. In order to ensure that review of the proposed changes. A
the integrity of the Canyon Rim is public hearing shall then be held before Recommend approval as
preserved, a balance between the Commission for a recommendation presented
acceptable development uses, and to the Council to amend the PUD, 0 Recommend approval with
necessary preservation should prevail." amend with recommendations or deny conditions
The comprehensive Ian further states: the request. Recommend denial
p p Table the Request for
Community Character Goal 2: Preserve Applicable Regulations or Codes additional information.
the Canyon Rim — Policy 2.1 Continue Per the Canyon Park West PUD #264,
to protect the Canyon rim through CityCode 10-4-8 & 10-4-19: a hotel Attachments
enforcement of City Code and would require a Special Use Permit and 1. Vicinity Map
ordinances that balance private a request to City Council to exceed the 2. Narrative
property rights and the desire for the public access to the Canyon Rim Trail height restrictions of the zones. In 3. Draft PUD Amendment
System. addition to the SUP requirement, any 4. Site Plan
building proposed to exceed twenty-five 5. Building Renderings
Potential Impacts feet (25') in the CRO requires a design 6. Elevation Exhibit
All development brings its share of committee review.As such,the applicant 7. Excerpts from Canyon Park West
impacts; additional development in a is requesting to amend the PUD as Design Standards
developed area brings a new slate of required in City Code 10-6-1.
8. Photos
issues and impacts to the surrounding 9. Citizen Emails
developed properties.
A hotel will bring vehicular traffic to the
area, however, the increase will be
minimal compared to the overall traffic
volume already experienced in this
area, and the increase will actually be
less than the currently approved Retail
Store and Restaurant that could be
constructed. Due to its proximity along
the Canyon Rim Trail, we can expect
increased use of that public amenity.
Another potential impact will be the
visual impact on the rim of the canyon.
This building will be visible from the
Perrine Bridge and from certain areas
on the canyon floor. The extent of the
impact on individuals is difficult to
quantify as visual impacts are
perception based, and each individual
creates their own narrative and
perceived impact. However, staff can
point to an existing situation in order to
give context to this request. The
building which houses Elevation 486,
sits back 50' from the rim and is 56' tall,
as measured from an elevation which is
ten feet (10') higher than the adjacent
Canyon Rim Trail.
VICINITY MAP 0 Feet 300
NORTH
44.
Canyon
Pa
- :rr
VI
i 3'' ' ``, :fj!
West 264 '
t.1 1 . ,�'` Canyon:Park
.�
Canyon Park IF
East;r East 223
/ West 264
MagiC
Valle Mall
.f=. . Y
ZDA
_ ter
CRO OS Current Zoning: C-1 PUD CRO Existing Land Use: Commercial and
Vacant
PUD R-1 VAR Comprehensive Plan: Mixed Use Proposed Land Use: Hotel
[�I C-1 S U I Surrounding Zoning Designations & Land Use(s)
North: OS AOI (Snake River Canyon); East: OS CRO; Civic
AOI Parks
South: C-1 PUD CRO; Commercial West: C-1 PUD CRO; Commercial
Applicable Regulations -
10-1-4, 10-1-5, 10-4-8, 10-7-12, 10-10-11, 10-11-1 thru 8, 10-13
VICINITY MAP 0 Feet 430
NORTH
A'.
A '
s
Canyon Park
Canyon Park
East 223
W est 219
& 264 0
s-
l Blue Lakes - Magic Valley Mall ZDA
Concept Magic Valley Mall 0
91 0 II li
f • • APRIL
�IREFERENCE ONLY
CRO R-1 VAR Current Zoning: C-1 PUD CRO Existing Land Use: Vacant
PUD F R-4 Future Land Use: Mixed Use Proposed Land Use: Hotel
Surrounding Zoning Designations & Land Use(s)
0 C-1 0 SUI North: OS AOI; Snake River East: OS CRO; Visitors Center
AOI Canyon
South: C-1 PUD CRO; Commercial West: C-1 PUD CRO; Commercial
Applicable Regulations
10-4-8, 10-4-19, 10-6-1, Canyon West PUDs #219 & #264
Supplemental Information to Accompany a PUD Amendment Request
This application for amendment of the Canyon Park West PUD has been prepared to permit the use of a
multi-story hotel and the necessary height allowances to construct the Hotel at the Canyon Park West
site.The specific details for the request are attached hereto. Effectively,the request will permit the use
of hotel within the project which is consistent with the underlying C-1 zoning use restrictions. Additional
height for the hotel will be required and is detailed in the language of the PUD Amendment.
The proposed change will likely compliment the surrounding area which has been developed into retail
shopping centers, restaurants, and individual banks or credit unions.The project location is important as
well.This site captures unique views of the Snake River Canyon lands and is at the forefront of Twin
Falls.The Perrine Bridge Entry into the City of Twin Falls is very near the project site.
The history of the Canyon Park West PUD included the hotel use planned for an eight to ten story hotel
in its original form. As the project developed and individual site users were identified, the PUD was
amended to exclude the hotel use and add more restaurant and service uses. However, some of those
individual users have backed away from the project and new users have been identified. Home2Suites is
interested and pursuing purchase of the property for the purpose of constructing one of their hotels
thereon.This amendment is the first step in that process to permit the use and the necessary height.
The hours of operation are compatible with the surrounding retail shopping and restaurant users.There
exists cross-use access and parking agreements to provide for the proper flow of traffic and to provide
adequate parking.
The changes to the area are not expected to be detrimental, rather the completion of the development
of this area is expected to compliment the surrounding area and provide a service which is needed
within the City of Twin Falls. Landscaping,trail access, and utility service to the surrounding area is
expected to be compatible with what has already been established and the design team consists of
many of the same partners which originally developed the property.
FIRST AMENDMENT
CANYON PARK WEST (AMENDED)
C-1 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT ("First Amendment") is made and entered into this day of
, 2019, by and between the CITY OF TWIN FALLS, a municipal corporation,
State of Idaho ("City"), Geronimo L.L.C. , a Utah limited liability company whose address is
2733 East Parleys Way, Suite 300, Salt Lake City, Utah 84109 ("Geronimo"), Base Jumper
L.L.C., a Utah limited liability company, whose address is 2733 East Parleys Way, Suite 300,
Salt Lake City Utah 84109 ("Base Jumper"), Base Jumper Two L.L.C., a Utah limited liability
company, whose address is 2733 East Parleys Way, Suite 300, Salt Lake City Utah 84109
("Base Jumper Two"), and Idaho Central Credit Union, an Idaho nonprofit corporation whose
address is P.O. Box 2469, Pocatello, ID 83206 ("Idaho Central").
WHEREAS, the City, Canyon Park I, LLC "CP I"), and Canyon Park Development, LLC, an
Idaho limited liability company ("CP Development") entered into that certain CANYON PARK
WEST (AMENDED), C-1 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT dated August
20, 2012 and filed of record in Twin Falls County and recorded for City of Twin Falls under
Instrument No. 2012-016013 (26 pages)with the County Clerk("PUD"); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to that certain Grant Deed dated November 1, 2012 and filed of record in
Twin Falls County and recorded for Alliance Title under Instrument No. 2012-021238 (3 pages)
with the County Clerk, CP Development transferred to Base Jumper Two all right, title and
interest in Lot 5 in Block 1 of Canyon Park North Subdivision according to the official plat
thereof, filed in Book 17 of Plats at Page(s) 29, records of Twin Falls County, Idaho (LOT 11 OF
THE PUD); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to that certain Grant Deed dated November 1, 2012 and filed of record in
Twin Falls County and recorded for Alliance Title under Instrument No. 2012-021239 (3 pages)
with the County Clerk, CP I transferred to Base Jumper all right, title and interest in Lots 2 and
3 in Block I of Canyon Park East Subdivision (less and except a portion of said Lot 3 as
described therein) according to the official plat thereof, filed in Book 17 of Plats at Page(s) 40,
records of Twin Falls County, Idaho, and Lot 4 in Block 2 of Canyon Park West No 1
Subdivision according to the official plat thereof, filed in Book 16 of Plats at Page(s) 20, records
of Twin Falls County, Idaho, and Lot 6 in Block 1 of Canyon Park North Subdivision according
to the official plat thereof, filed in Book 17 of Plats at Page(s) 29, records of Twin Falls County,
Idaho (LOT 1 AND 12 OF THE PUD); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to that certain Special Warranty Deed dated January 31, 2014 and filed of
record in Twin Falls County and recorded for Alliance Title- Twin Falls under Instrument No.
2014-001951 (3 pages)with the County Clerk, CP Development transferred to Idaho Central all
right, title and interest in Lot 3 in Block 1 of Canyon Park Amended Subdivision, a Planned Unit
Development, a resubdivision and renumbering of a portion of Canyon Park North Subdivision
and a portion of Canyon Park West No. I Subdivision, according to the official plat thereof, filed
in Book 24 of Plats at Page(s) 27, records of Twin Falls County, Idaho under recorder's
Instrument No. 2013-025885 (LOT 3 OF THE PUD); and
Canyon Park West 1
369-11 First Amendment 61790375
WHEREAS, pursuant to that certain Grant Deed dated April 3, 2014 and filed of record in Twin
Falls County and recorded for Alliance Title- Twin Falls under Instrument No. 2014-005426 (3
pages) with the County Clerk, CP Development transferred to Geronimo all right, title and
interest in Tract A, Tract B, Lot 2, Lot 4, Lot 5 and Lot 6 all in Block 1 of Canyon Park
Amended Subdivision, a Planned Unit Development, a resubdivision and renumbering of a
portion of Canyon Park North Subdivision and a portion of Canyon Park West No. I Subdivision,
according to the official plat thereof, filed in Book 24 of Plats at Page(s) 27, records of Twin
Falls County, Idaho under recorder's Instrument No. 2013-025885 (Tract A, and LOTS 2, 4, 5, 6,
7, 8, 9, AND 10 OF THE PUD); and
WHEREAS, all terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings attributed thereto in
the PUD; and
WHEREAS, Geronimo has agreed to sell a portion of the Property owned by Geronimo more
particularly described as that certain tract of land located in the City of Twin Falls, County of
Twin Falls, State of Idaho, known as Lot 6 of Canyon Park Amended Subdivision, recorded as
Entry No. 2013-025885 in the Twin Falls County recorder's office (hereafter the "Hotel
Property"); and
WHEREAS, the purchaser of the Hotel Property intends to use the Hotel Property as a hotel and
has requested certain amendments to the PUD; and
WHEREAS, the parties hereto, as the successor-in-interest to CP Development and CP I have the
power to amend the PUD without the joinder of any other person other than the City; and
WHEREAS, City, by and through its City Council, has agreed to the amendments to the PUD as
provided herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein,
City, Geronimo, Base Jumper Two, Base Jumper, and Idaho Central agree as follows:
A. INCORPORATION OF RECITALS. The foregoing recitals are incorporated herein by
reference.
B. NATURE OF DEVELOPMENT- USES. Section 2 B. of the PUD is hereby amended to
add"hotel" as an outright permitted use for the Hotel Property.
C. INDIVIDUAL PARCEL DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA-BUILDING SETBACKS:
Section 5 B. of the PUD is hereby amended to provide that Buildings on the Hotel
Property shall be set back not less than fifty(50) feet from the Snake River Canyon.
D. INDIVIDUAL PARCEL DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA-BUILDING STANDARDS:
Section 5 G.3. g. of the PUD is hereby amended as follows: Buildings on the Hotel
Property may extend up to sixty (60) feet above the top of the existing retaining wall as
depicted on Exhibit A attached hereto.
Canyon Park West 2
369-11 First Amendment 61790375
E. WAIVER OF CITIZEN'S REVIEW COMMITTEE: Any requirement for a citizens'
design review committee whether contained in the Canyon Rim Overlay City Code 10-4-
19.4(C) 4.b.(2) or elsewhere are waived for the Hotel Property such that the design and
materials used for the proposed building on the Hotel Property are not required to be
reviewed by any committee.
F. INDIVIDUAL PARCEL DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA-COMPLIANCE WITH
CANYON RIM ORDINANCES: Section 5 G.3. i. of the PUD, and all laws, rules and
regulations in each of the City Code of the City of Twin Falls, the Canyon Rim Overlay
District, the Canyon Rim Ordinances, and any and all other laws, rules or regulations
affecting the Hotel Property are hereby amended as follows: To the extent of any
conflicts with the provisions of this First Amendment to the Canyon Park West
(Amended) C-1 Planned Unit Development Agreement, the provisions of this First
Amendment shall supersede all such conflicting provisions.
G. COUNTERPARTS: This agreement may be executed in as many counterparts as may be
deemed necessary and convenient, and by the different parties hereto on separate
counterparts, each of which, when so executed, shall be deemed an original, but all such
counterparts shall constitute one and the same instrument.
SIGNATURES COMMENCE
ON FOLLOWING PAGE
Canyon Park West 3
369-11 First Amendment 61790375
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has affixed its seal and caused these presents to be
executed by its Mayor as of the date above written.
City:
CITY OF TWIN FALLS
BY:
Shawn Barigar, Mayor
ACKNOWLEGEMENTS
STATE OF IDAHO )
)ss.
County of Twin Falls )
On this_day of , 2019, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public for
Idaho, personally appeared, Shawn Barigar, known to me to be the Mayor of the City of Twin
Falls, the municipal corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and
acknowledged to me that such municipal corporation executed the same.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year first
above written.
Notary Public for Idaho
Residing at , Idaho
My Commission Expires
SIGNATURES CONTINUE
ON FOLLOWING PAGE
Canyon Park West 4
369-11 First Amendment 61790375
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Geronimo has affixed its seal and caused these presents to be
executed by its duly authorized representatives as of the date above written.
Geronimo:
GERONIMO L.L.C., a Utah limited liability company
By: WOODBURY STRATEGIC PARTNERS FUND, L.P.,
a Delaware limited partnership, Its Manager
By: WSP TRUFFLES L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company,
Its General Partner
By: WOODBURY STRATEGIC PARTNERS MANAGEMENT
L.L.C., a Utah limited liability company, Its Manager
By: WOODBURY CORPORATION, a Utah corporation,
Its Authorized Representative
By:
O. Randall Woodbury, President
By:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ON FOLLOWING PAGE
Canyon Park West 5
369-11 First Amendment 61790375
STATE OF UTAH )
. ss.
COUNTY OF SALT LAKE )
On the day of 2019, before me personally appeared O. Randall
Woodbury, to me personally known, who being by me duly sworn did say that he is the President
of WOODBURY CORPORATION, a Utah corporation, known to be the Authorized
Representative of WOODBURY STRATEGIC PARTNERS MANAGEMENT L.L.C., a Utah
limited liability company, known to be the Manager of WSP TRUFLES L.L.C., a Delaware
limited liability company, known to be the general Partners of WOODBURY STRATEGIC
PARTNERS FUND, L.P. a Delaware limited partnership, Manager of GERONIMO L.L.C., a
Utah limited liability company, the company that executed the within instrument, known to me
to be the person who executed the within instrument on behalf of said company therein named,
and acknowledged to me that such company executed the within instrument pursuant to its
Operating Agreement.
Notary Public for
Residing at
My Commission Expires
STATE OF UTAH )
ss.
COUNTY OF SALT LAKE )
On the day of 2019, before me personally appeared
, to me personally known, who being by me duly sworn did
say that he is the of WOODBURY CORPORATION, a
Utah corporation, known to be the Authorized Representative of WOODBURY STRATEGIC
PARTNERS MANAGEMENT L.L.C., a Utah limited liability company, known to be the
Manager of WSP TRUFLES L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, known to be the
general Partners of WOODBURY STRATEGIC PARTNERS FUND, L.P. a Delaware limited
partnership, Manager of GERONIMO L.L.C., a Utah limited liability company, the company
that executed the within instrument, known to me to be the person who executed the within
instrument on behalf of said company therein named, and acknowledged to me that such
company executed the within instrument pursuant to its Operating Agreement.
Notary Public for
Residing at
My Commission Expires
SIGNATURES CONTINUE
ON FOLLOWING PAGE
Canyon Park West 6
369-11 First Amendment 61790375
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Base Jumper has affixed its seal and caused these presents to
be executed by its duly authorized representatives as of the date above written.
Base Jumper:
Base Jumper L.L.C.,
a Utah limited liability company
By:
Title:
STATE OF )
)ss.
County of )
On this day of , 2019, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in
and for said State,personally appeared , known or identified to me to be the
of Base Jumper L.L.C., a Utah limited liability company, who subscribed said
company name to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the within
instrument on behalf of said such company.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the
day and year in this certificate first above written.
Notary Public for
Residing at
My Commission Expires
Canyon Park West 7
369-11 First Amendment 61790375
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Base Jumper Two has affixed its seal and caused these
presents to be executed by its duly authorized representatives as of the date above written.
Base Jumper Two:
Base Jumper Two L.L.C.,
a Utah limited liability company
By:
Title:
STATE OF )
)ss.
County of )
On this_day of , 2019, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in
and for said State,personally appeared , known or identified to me to be the
of Base Jumper Two L.L.C., a Utah limited liability company, who subscribed
said company name to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the
within instrument on behalf of said such company.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the
day and year in this certificate first above written.
Notary Public for
Residing at
My Commission Expires
Canyon Park West 8
369-11 First Amendment 61790375
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Idaho Central has affixed its seal and caused these presents to
be executed by its duly authorized representatives as of the date above written.
Idaho Central:
Idaho Central Credit Union,
an Idaho nonprofit corporation
By:
Title:
STATE OF )
)ss.
County of )
On this_day of , 2019, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in
and for said State,personally appeared , known or identified to me to be the
of Idaho Central Credit Union, an Idaho nonprofit corporation, who subscribed
said company name to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the
within instrument on behalf of said such corporation.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the
day and year in this certificate first above written.
Notary Public for
Residing at
My Commission Expires
Canyon Park West 9
369-11 First Amendment 61790375
FIRST AMENDMENT
CANYON PARK WEST (AMENDED)
C-1 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
Exhibit A
1
Approximate Walkway S�
Measurement
H25 Beacon 's
PARAPET
vV dWE9
t�.TftSS eEd WS
Hotel 4th Floor
i.
4t FLOOR
! r
Hotel-3rd Floor g
'a
Hotel 2nd Floor $ �
h d FLOORpp�
"a
Hotel' lot Floor
$ke FLOOR
e
� s
BUILDING HEIGHT SECTION
Canyon Park West 10
369-11 First Amendment 61790375
't
Area of Request
f7r'
I I
� r
!1 u
, ri
ill u i
1 I it ,I
LU
r
II ,I
I I i l I 1 1
I _
TIT11 1�,,
v °. j ii
jpqL • i y r r '1
`• _ 11 � I I
III'IIII� �,
•/ i I 11111117
JO • �i � ' � lii
1,
r
■ � � , � 1 ������ ��� '-•�`?-'� _-'..�' � •i�i i�� I I I jj"`�� ='"IIII:�:� -'�'_•-._��1j 111 111 111 tMl III !U IUiI �� I�I _ __ _ � I
NORTHEAST GROUND VIEW SOUTH GROUND VIEW
CANYON PARK
McNeillSBA _ A-6
hotel architecture design • 0
BEACON
H25 Beacon e
PARAPET
ROOF
VARIES
TRU55 BEARING
Hotel 4th Floor
o�
4th FLOOR
Hotel ' 3rd Floor a
m
3rd FLOOR
v
M
Hotel 2nd Floor a
2nd FLOOR
0
Hotel Ist Floor
Ist FLOOR
I.-
Fr 4
➢r I2
McNeill � � CANYON PARK BUILDING HEIGHT SECTION
hotel company TWIN FALLS, ID SCALE: I/8" = I'-0'
Design Guidelines
CANYON PARK WEST, TWIN FALLS, IDAHO
INDEX
Pg. Title
_ 1 Cover
2 Aerial View
low-
3 Local Inspirations
4 Design Features/Materials
7 Site Plan
8 Landscape Guidelines
r 9 Landscape Design Features
&Inspiration
r" 10 Site Amenities
- 11 Site Lighting
12 Site Signage
ilk gyp= WOODBURY
—
�— CORPORATION
1
Design Features/Materials DESIGN • Backside of project shall incorporate landscape elements and trees that screen service yards.Major HVAC units
• Utilize a consistent palette of building materials. shall be screened from view of canyon rim.Screens shall be architecturally appealing.Building walls to
• Allow for variety of EIFS colors within same color families. incorporate a variety of patterns,texture,and color as an extension of the Canyon's edge.
• Allow major anchor prototype designs with adaptations to shopping center concepts. • Paint electrical equipment to match primary facade color or as selected by Development Design Review
• Provide distinct identity for each major anchor. Committee(D.D.R.C.)
• Provide variety and texture on elevations facing canyon. • At key corners,utilize tower forms with a two story appearance and upper level illumination behind iron
• Maximum building height not to exceed 35-ft. formwork silhouettes.Towers may exceed 35'in height.
• Allow architectural embellishments and features to exceed 35;but in._ se more • Interrupt long expanses of facades for lower profile tenants with columnar elements highlighted with wall
at entrance of major tenants. sconces.
• Brick used on primary facade. .
• Incorporate raised elements and extended canopies for large format tenants reflective of • Horizontal coursing can be used to provide variety in texture and increased articulation.Banding colors shall be in
their prototypical design within the context of the project's material and color palette. earth tones.Accent colors,defined as non-earth tones,may be used if they do not create continuous bands and will
not cover more than 10%of the exterior wall surface.Non-earth tone accent or band colors are subject to approval
by D.D.R.C..
• All elevations are subject to D.D.R.C..
Mo-fi-f i,o�eol, I�tj fe-cgf &s base-ol, o-�, -H4 v,�at,
Pe-rrbAz b,-E ge e&w &o-,-s fa,A,v,A o-K, � c 4-_9o-Pt,
v
Corte,V Stut,
Lk - eA b-y E I F S
PerrbAz 13rLolge
L i g lNh lie a TENANT -- -- -TENANT — - S-fr wc4,,t,rat, 13 r
-Co rte K, S tut -
Fi.vws�� � --
- ArclA i to I-wrest,
Go-v�,cre�;e
SAMPLE ELEVATION
WOOD13URY
� =
C O R P O R A T I O N
4
Design Features/Materials
FRONT FACADE EXAMPLE
Materials and colors provides as examples. Similar
materials/colors may be acceptable.
FLASHING EIFS I EIFS II CMU
Steel Rust colored Custom Concrete Variety of Warm Split-faced
Color Neutral Colors Signetics Brown
Buehner Block _
JA
p p The materials used are inspired by the different
p, elements found in Twin Falls. The red structural
brick is the material used on historical buildings
located downtown Twin Falls.
The color palette is reflective of the canyon walls
and natural elements in the area.
STRUCTURAL BRICK FOUNDATION CANOPY BRICK ACCENTS
Monterey Architectural Rusted or Midnight Black UST
Interstate Brick Concrete Corten Steel Interstate Brick
WOODBURY
��� CORPORATION
Design Features/Materials
BACK FACADE EXAMPLE _
Colors and Materials provided as examples. -
Similar materials/colors may be acceptable °`°"°°Y
s_�.._ � J:-%ice-��'.�lr. ...-• .... .
STRUCTURAL BRICK CMU PLANTS & %
LANDSCAPING
BRICK ACCENTS NINE
Earth Tones CMU ACCENT.
Monterey Non-Earth Tones as Interstate Brick ■ accepted by D.D.R.0 BAND
Midnight Black ■
Interstate Brick
Earth Tones
The main objectives of back elevation design:
-Be sensitive to exposure from bridge,canyon and trail.
-Screen loading and trash areas with walls and landscape
-Use variation in height,plan and materials to break up facades.
ttvnc -Use trees,shrubs,vines,green walls,rocks and other landscape
features to screen buildings,service areas and provide a"park'
or"natural"feel to the project.
-Where possible,enclose trash receptacles,equipemnt and other
desireable elements within walls or screned areas.
-Use similar materials as the front elevation.
ROOFTOP HVAC SCREENING
WO DBURY
'Lill CO RPO RA
Landscape
Existing Structure/Wall
C � 1
}
Brick Pavers Decorative Panel
e estrian Parkway,Trail,and Visitors Center
A c� anyon view path runs around the project,along the canyon rim,and extends to the Twin Falls Community Visitor's Center and ,,,_r o,_ :•: a
canyon view lookout point.Low stacked boulder walls,using natural basalt/lava rock,will add a structural accent along the canyon
view path.Landscaping,including elements of the surrounding desert and agrarian plants,will screen the parkway/canyon view
path from the back of the development.Interpretive signs and rest areas with Canyon Bridge motif benches will be provided creat-
ing areas for viewing,contemplation,or congregation.Rusted steel features and amenities will further reflect influences from the
bridge and community.Pedestrian scale lighting will be added to provide both low levels of illumination and interesting shadowing
effects at night.
Snake River Canyon
The inclusion of rock and landscape elements will be indicative of the high desert and the rugged Snake River Canyon terrain. 4 `^
Canyon colored boulders will be included throughout the project.Mulches in planting and landscaped areas will be primarily earth
toned inorganic materials to contrast with the dark boulders. The mature landscape will appear lush with 75%of the rock mulch
covered at plant maturity.Mosaic patterns using different sizes and colors of mulch will add interest and break up landscaped areas
creating a visual texture in otherwise uniform areas.
CITY OF
'ITWIN FALL'
19 4
0, Q�OC
'ClIV"o
r
i i41
I 97
�
AI��R
as,.
r
W:Altw
�'� _ ►
M z,
z„
r
r
as
_ _ •-- _ �r ' cam. - _ .�_P.yo..�, 4 I �_ !
• r'` i " Aaski. .� .'.._'ga_ �w� �, TI• •//- •�_ r
r�III •.v- �t��� ��� ...r. v.v •••• _ _
i�
CITY OF
I WIN FALL' Jon==
MAIM
SFk V�Nv
l i •
ti
J
y
G '�x
Steve O'Connor
From: Jonathan Spendlove
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 7:57 AM
To: Steve O'Connor
Subject: FW: Planned Hotel
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
From: Cassie Hulme<cassiesmoorman@hotmail.com>
Sent:Tuesday,January 15, 2019 7:56 AM
To:Jonathan Spendlove<JSpend love @tfid.org>
Subject: Planned Hotel
I am writing this letter in regards to the proposed project of a hotel on the canyon edge. In the last two years I have seen
more development of office buildings and housing going up everywhere. I have lived in Twin Falls Idaho my whole life
and have loved what Idaho has always been and not what it is becoming now. I loved seeing the open land and space of
farms and ranches. But now all you see is houses and buildings going up and eventually all that open space of farms and
ranches will be gone. I truly oppose this hotel on the canyon rim that is not what Idaho is. You do not take a beautiful
canyon and turn into a glass hotel for nothing more than a profit for developers. We need to stop all this development
and selling off farm land for big corporations and housing and preserve what Twin Falls Idaho is and was about.
Cassie Hulme
305 Lucille Street
Kimberly ID 83341
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
1
Steve O'Connor
From: Jonathan Spendlove
Sent: Monday,January 14, 2019 1:51 PM
To: Steve O'Connor
Subject: FW: Proposal for Hotel on Canyon Rim
From: Silversurfer<linmic17@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday,January 14, 2019 11:02 AM
To:Jonathan Spendlove<JSpend love @tfid.org>
Subject: Proposal for Hotel on Canyon Rim
Dear Mr. Spendlove:
Having just read that a corporation is planning to build a several story hotel next to the
Visitors Center, I am submitting comments prior to the council meeting scheduled for
January 29.
Please cancel plans for such construction. This would absolutely create a blight on our
beautiful canyon rim trail and overshadow the architectural designs of both the Perrine
Bridge and Visitors Center. A hotel at this location is a bad idea no matter how many
stories high.
In my opinion I recommend that particular spot beside the Visitors Center would be
better served by a one story restaurant-cafe with additional outside seating overlooking
the canyon trail, similar to the Council Crest restaurant and Elevation designs. Their
landscaping and barrier rock walls are in good taste and blend in well. The restaurant-
cafe style of Panera Bakery is one the city business planner should solicit. I know Panera
well - and it has a very popular and tasteful design beyond any coffeehouse or bakery-
restaurant in Twin Falls in addition to an excellent varied menu. If you can't solicit
Panera to join our community, please look for a similar type of business. Please avoid
the fast food chains that now line up on Blue Lakes blvd and Pole Line.
Please do NOT allow the esthetics of the canyon rim trail to be ruined with oversized
buildings that would detract from the well laid out design that now exists. Don't turn
Twin Falls into just another strip mall of concrete buildings.
Thank you for considering my comments.
Linda Michaels
2140 Elizabeth blvd
Twin Falls, ID
208.358.1025
i
Jonathan Spendlove
From: GLEN and LOIS SHAW <glenandlois@msn.com>
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2019 10:15 AM
To: Jonathan Spendlove
Subject: New Hotel
My wife and I are FULLY against the building of a new hotel on the canyon rim.
Glen & Lois Shaw
1090 Terra Ave.
Twin Falls, ID 83301
(253) 905-5072 (cell)
1