HomeMy WebLinkAboutPUD Amendment Staff Report PZ18-0099 CITY OF
TMN FALLS
Comprehensive 1p4v
Staff Report o
.-<./�y'�+:• ' _ 75 BLUE Q`e SERVING QUO
r �^
To: Planning &Zoning Commission
t
Presenter: Steve O'Connor, City Planner
Request: To Amend PUD #264 to allow
"Hotel" as a permitted use and to increase
maximum building height to sixty feet (60') for
property located at 2151 Fillmore Street.
Application: PZ18-0099
Applicant:
O 9BLi1 Geronimo, LLC
KESBL Y
c/o EHM Engineers
208.734.4888
AERIAL PHOTO APRIL 2016REFERENCE ONLY dthibault@ehminc.com
19 5 BLUE
Public
Analysis would outright permit a hotel on the this area dating back over two decades,
This request is to amend the Canyon property identified as the "Hotel and multiple amendments to those
Park West PUD #264 to add "Hotel" as Property" and allow for a maximum PUD's.
a permitted use specifically on the building height sixty feet (60'), as
property identified as the "Hotel measured from the top of the existing complicate matters, a Citizen's
D
Property" within the PUD amendment. retaining wall (see attachment #5), to Design Review Committee was created
The amendment also requests to without a design review committee convention center consider a 10 story hotel with
increase the maximum height to sixty recommendation. c this area. The
feet (60'), and remove the requirement committee approved the request in
for a design review committee per the As a point of clarification this request January 2007. However, staff has no
CRO development standards. does not forego the requirement to record of a development agreement
meet the design standards for being approved by City Council to
The original Canyon Park West PUD construction as set forth in PUD #264 develop the property in that manner.
#219, approved in 2000, required an (see attachment #6). The renderings
SUP for a hotel. provided by the applicant have colors Since the committee's approval in
and materials depicted. However,those 2007, Canyon Park West PUD#264 has
Canyon Park North #1 PUD #222, also items are not part of the application, been approved a recorded with no
approved in the year 2000, would have and are not being requested for mention of a high rise hotel. It is staffs
required an SUP for any hotel on change.The renderings are conceptual, determination that the current iteration
properties within its boundaries. and have not been reviewed for of the governing PUD supersedes that
However, PUD #222 is no longer in compliance with the applicable design committee's approval.
effect as Canyon Park West PUD #264 standards. Compliance with colors and
encompasses and supersedes all of Comprehensive Plan Compliance
P P materials are reviewed during Building
PUD #222. Permit submittals. This area is designated as Mixed Use on
the Future Land Use map for the 2016
Canyon Park West PUD#264,approved On Tuesday, January 29, 2019, the Comprehensive Plan "Grow With Us."
in 2012, includes all of PUD #222 and Planning & Zoning Commission voted Mixed Use is a broad use category
most of PUD #219, a few properties two (2) in favor, six (6) not in favor, and ranging from Multi-Family complexes to
were excluded (such as Zions Bank and one (1) abstention of the application as Light Commercial all within the same
Golden Corral). The requested presented. development or even the same
amendment is specific to PUD #264 building. A hotel meets these criteria as
which must follow both the C-1 and History it would add another service to a range
CRO use regulations and development The history on this property and request of services found along a corridor which
standards as listed in City Code. If the is a bit lengthy and convoluted. There supports Civic, Commercial,
proposed amendment is approved, it have been multiple PUD's approved in Recreational and Residential uses.
The Comprehensive Plan also contains ten feet (10') higher than the adjacent Conclusion
a vision and goals with the intent to Canyon Rim Trail. The commission is tasked with making a
protect the canyon rim. "Development recommendation to City Council. The
near the Canyon Rim should be Approval Process Commission may do one of the
carefully considered. Retail Per Twin Falls City Code 10-6-1.4(E) following:
development along the Canyon Rim Approval of a ZDA Sub-District requires
threatens the appeal and natural quality a preliminary presentation to the Recommend approval as
of the rim. The Canyon Rim is an Planning and Zoning Commission for a presented
important feature and viewpoint, a review of the proposed changes. A 0 Recommend approval with
striking visual landscape, and a coveted public hearing shall then be held before conditions
recreational site. In order to ensure that the Commission for a recommendation 0 Recommend denial
the integrity of the Canyon Rim is to the Council to amend the PUD, 0 Table the Request for
preserved, a balance between amend with recommendations or deny additional information.
acceptable development uses, and the request.
necessary preservation should prevail." Attachments
The comprehensive plan further states: Applicable Regulations or Codes 1. Vicinity Map
Community Character Goal 2: Preserve Per the Canyon Park West PUD #264, 2. Narrative
the Canyon Rim — Policy 2.1 Continue City Code 10-4-8 & 10-4-19: a hotel 3. Draft PUD Amendment
to protect the Canyon rim through would require a Special Use Permit and 4. Site Plan
enforcement of City Code and a request to City Council to exceed the 5. Building Renderings
ordinances that balance private height restrictions of the zones. In 6. Elevation Exhibit
property rights and the desire for the addition to the SUP requirement, any 7. Excerpts from Canyon Park West
public access to the Canyon Rim Trail building proposed to exceed twenty-five Design Standards
feet (25') in the CRO requires a design
System. committee review.As such,the applicant 8. Photos
Potential Impacts is requesting to amend the PUD as 9. Citizen Emails
All development brings its share of required in City Code 10-6-1.
impacts; additional development in a
developed area brings a new slate of
issues and impacts to the surrounding
developed properties.
A hotel will bring vehicular traffic to the
area, however, the increase will be
minimal compared to the overall traffic
volume already experienced in this
area, and the increase will actually be
less than the currently approved Retail
Store and Restaurant that could be
constructed. Due to its proximity along
the Canyon Rim Trail, we can expect
increased use of that public amenity.
Another potential impact will be the
visual impact on the rim of the canyon.
This building will be visible from the
Perrine Bridge and from certain areas
on the canyon floor. The extent of the
impact on individuals is difficult to
quantify as visual impacts are
perception based, and each individual
creates their own narrative and
perceived impact. However, staff can
point to an existing situation in order to
give context to this request. The
building which houses Elevation 486,
sits back 50' from the rim and is 56' tall,
as measured from an elevation which is
VICINITY MAP 0 Feet 300
NORTH
44.
Canyon
Pa
- :rr
VI
i 3'' ' ``, :fj!
West 264 '
t.1 1 . ,�'` Canyon:Park
.�
Canyon Park IF
East;r East 223
/ West 264
MagiC
Valle Mall
.f=. . Y
ZDA
_ ter
CRO OS Current Zoning: C-1 PUD CRO Existing Land Use: Commercial and
Vacant
PUD R-1 VAR Comprehensive Plan: Mixed Use Proposed Land Use: Hotel
[�I C-1 S U I Surrounding Zoning Designations & Land Use(s)
North: OS AOI (Snake River Canyon); East: OS CRO; Civic
AOI Parks
South: C-1 PUD CRO; Commercial West: C-1 PUD CRO; Commercial
Applicable Regulations -
10-1-4, 10-1-5, 10-4-8, 10-7-12, 10-10-11, 10-11-1 thru 8, 10-13